День: 12.11.2017

РОССИЯ И БАЛКАНСКИЕ СТРАНЫ - ДИАЛОГ ЦИВИЛИЗАЦИЙ 

Международная конференция "Россия и Балканские страны - перспективы сотрудничества" прошла 10 ноября 2017 года в гостинице Метрополь. В конференции, которая была организована МДК "Amicability" и АНО "Центр моделирования стратегического планирования" приняли участие эксперты Совета Федерации, ГД РФ, Византийского клуба, во главе с известным российским политологом Сергеем Марковым, а также известный болгарский политик Румен Петков, Чрезвычайный Полномочный Республики Болгария Коцев Бойко. Модератором конференции выступил Президент МДК "Amicability" Сергей Дворянов. Во время торжественной церемонии открытия Конференции вице-президент клуба "Amicability" Владимир Дворянов зачитал торжественное обращение к участникам от доктора экономических наук, профессора Сергея Юрьевича Глазьева, Советника Президенрта РФ Владимира Путина. Также было зачитано торжественное обращение со стороны Ольги Усковой, Президента Международного инвестиционного Софийского клуба. Конференция в Метрополе в зале "Чехов" прошла в активном, успешном режиме, в конструктивном ключе. Давний друг России болгарский политик Румен Петков, который принял участие в Международной конференции "Россия и Балканские страны - перспективы сотрудничества" вручил Президенту АНО "Центр моделирования стратегического планирования" мусульманину Союну Садыкову икону Богородицы, которая была освещена В Храме Святого Александра Невского, в Софии.

Вручение святой иконы проходило в обстановке Дружбы, Доверия и Благоговения. Союн Садыков передал православную икону Богородицы Председателю Правления "Византийского клуба" Сергею Маркову. Между Руменом Петковым, МДК "Amicability" и Международным Софийским инвестиционным клубом были намечены планы для дальнейшего сотрудничества, в том числе проведение ряда конференций в Москве и Софии, а также открытие представительства "Византийского клуба" в Софии. В завершении конференции всеми участниками было подготовлено и подписано коллективное обращение к президенту страны Владимиру Путину с просьбой выдвинуть свою кандидатуру на выборы 2018 года.

Islamic State On The Korean Peninsula

“As we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns - the ones we don’t know we don’t know” - Donald Rumsfeld, United States Secretary of Defense.

What comes after Kim Jong-un? That is the question.

by Kudakwashe Kanhutu

Donald Rumsfeld, Secretary of Defence under George W. Bush during the 2003 Iraq invasion, said something that greatly amused pundits, he said: “As we know, there are known knowns; there are things we know we know. We also know there are known unknowns; that is to say we know there are some things we do not know. But there are also unknown unknowns—the ones we don’t know we don’t know.” While pundits and comedians were amused insofar as this could be a punchline when they tell their next joke at a party, the person who studies international dynamics, to make predictions on the next security threats, must take a different instruction from the “unknown unknowns” quote.

Donald Rumsfeld was trying to make the case that they should invade Saddam Hussein’s Iraq to obviate the danger of the “unknown unknowns” threat from Saddam Hussein. In hindsight, it was a disingenuous and cynical claim, because as it turns out, the invasion caused more instability and suffering than any unknown Saddam Hussein capability. This is not lost on analysts who notice that, the result of the invasion, was suffering for the Iraqis, and the creation of a hitherto unheard of armed group that now threatens Europe at will – the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS).

With the knowledge we now have of how things turned out in Iraq and Libya, after United States regime change actions there, we can make the case – with mathematical certainty – that if the United States attacks North Korea as threatened, the outcome is knowable. The United States thinks it can make a decapitating strike on the North Korean Supreme Leader. This will then lead to the population being freed from a dictatorship and thus there will be no retaliatory strikes from North Korean Rocket Forces. The problem with that line of reasoning is that experience belies it. It is no longer a case of unknown unknowns what will happen after regime change action, but known knowns: civil war and rise of armed non-state actors in those ungoverned spaces.

What will happen if the United States attacks North Korea, is that North Korea’s Rocket Forces will retaliate with missiles against South Korea and Japan – a situation which will put over 20 million people directly in harm’s way. But even if this danger was not there, and Kim Jong-Un could be removed by force, wherever a power vacuum has occurred, non-state armed groups have invariably filled the vacuum. We have never heard of a single terrorist attack in North Korea, but this will not be the case once the monopoly on the legitimate use of force is taken away. And with Islamic State being the umbrella of choice for those aggrieved by the West, it is not inconceivable that terrorist attacks against Western interests will start happening on the Korean Peninsula, if use of force is pursued as an option against North Korea. 

Kudakwashe Kanhutu